Test Identification Parade—No test identification parade was held in this case—Wife and other eye-witnesses were asked to identify the accused for the first time in the court, some eight and a half years after the incident—Held, the manner in which the widow witnessed the brutal murder of her husband, right in front of her eyes in broad day light, it would be difficult, if not impossible for her to forget the faces of the assailants—They would be imprinted on her psyche for ever—The High Court rightly rejected the submission that non holding of the test identification parade has caused any prejudice to the accused.
No comments:
Post a Comment