Evidence Act, 1872—Section 32(1)—Dying
declaration—It is settled law that if the prosecution solely depends on the
dying declaration, the normal rule is that the courts must exercise due care
and caution to ensure genuineness of the dying declaration, keeping in mind
that the accused had no opportunity to test the veracity of the statement of
the deceased by cross-examination—The law does not insist upon the
corroboration of dying declaration before it can be accepted—The insistence of
corroboration to a dying declaration is only a rule of prudence—When the Court
is satisfied that the dying declaration is voluntary, not tainted by tutoring
or animosity, and is not a product of the imagination of the declarant, in that
event, there is no impediment in convicting the accused on the basis of such
dying declaration.
Click here to download the full text of the judgment
Click here to download the full text of the judgment
No comments:
Post a Comment